Channelsales Worldwide

You have to admire Dell; they’ve been the poster child for the direct-sales only model since their beginnings.  2 years ago, Michael, the Board and a handful of execs embarked on radical approach to add the channel to their sales and delivery model.  Everyone was skeptical to pull this off on a large scale:  analysts, investors, employees and most importantly, IT solutions partners.

Well, fast forward 2 years and Dell has made some progress.  Dell reported today that has lowered its registration fee from $50k to $15k for partners; this is a remarkable step. http://tinyurl.com/ycwsc5m It doesn’t seem like a big deal, but it is.  It means that Dell has committed to use (new) tracking systems that on the direct side didn’t exist before; not just systems, but new policies to incentivize and monitor sales rep behavior, really, the whole go-to-market model.

In August, Channelweb reported at its annual conference in Washington DC, Xchange 09, that Dell was making positive and significant progress to creating and managing an effective, global standards channel program

But the animosity and skepticism of the channel vs. Dell is real and was readily apparent at Xchange.  When Dell’s Channel VP, Greg Davis got up to make his keynote speech, my immediate reaction was to make sure my program guide could be used as battlefield armor as I felt sure there was going to be a fiery exchange.  I was not disappointed.

In fact, I was quite worried when Greg opened up the discussion for channel partners to ask questions (which they did, in numbers).  I really admired Greg for getting up there and taking this heat.  His peers from Cisco, HP, Juniper, all of whom had spoken  the prior 2 days had a cake walk with Partner of the Year trophies, fancy videos, lots of laughs and enjoying advantage of their channel success.    Greg really had a tough draw to speak after all of that fun stuff and just before lunch on the last day.

The tension in the crowd was palpable; I was expecting a few tomatoes from that mornings breakfast buffet to go flying; seriously, I really thought it might come to blows.  But Greg took the heat graciously and sincerely.  He talked about how Dell is ‘walking the talk’:  sales reps that don’t follow new indirect policies are put on a performance plans and in fact have been fired for protecting direct deals.  Dell is serious about the channel.  They still have a lot of work to do but I concluded that they couldn’t remake the eggs they broke with a direct-model only and so instead, are putting together the ingredients to make a fine omelet.

As Dell moves more heavily into the Data Center, I think they realized that they couldn’t go anywhere without partners; so they had to unbreak some more eggs and make a omelets that is going to take several years before it is ready.

And what is happening with the large ISVs, SaaS and channel partners?  Traditionally, the large software companies have thrived with their complex, on-premise solutions that lead to mutual washing of the hands, with their long time companions, on premise SIs.  But now with SaaS, how do these large ISVs ‘break’ the eggs with their, almost in bred channel partners, SIs?

Large ISVs players are adding robust SaaS applications as I write this.  Just look at SAP, SAP Business Objects, Informatica (Ok, Salesforce fans they are behind but they are catching up).

I’m ravished and I can’t wait to see the recipe that the large ISVs are  creating to co-opt their on –premise SI partners, come SaaS ‘delivery’ partners.  It’s going to be a great brunch to enjoy when  ISVs follow Dell’s path to break some eggs and create a SI-base frittata for their SaaS solutions.

SaaS is very friendly to IT-based VARs!

Channel Web reports that mid-size companies are increasingly looking to embrace SaaS applications to run their business.  So, if you are a successful IT-based VAR (and scared to death about SaaS) here are some quick and easy (but very meaningful) steps you can take to help transition your business.  http://www.crn.com/software/220100314;jsessionid=XLQRA2YXDYCQPQE1GHPSKHWATMY32J

3 Action Plans You Can Implement Today as a Trusted (SaaS )Advisor:

1)     Help the CIO refine (define, in some cases) its security policy.   Hint:  most companies are grappling with opening up employee use of social networking, citing loss of productivity concerns.  Indeed that may or may not be the case.  But CIOs are struggling with giving Marketing and Sales (and HR) access to Social Networking to run their businesses while cutting off or limiting these tools across the organization.  Help the CIO figure out the policy (and technology mix) that will help them with this seemingly impossible task.

2)     Identify and study the relevant SaaS applications that your clients have considered and rejected.  Take your client to lunch and understand why these SaaS applications were rejected and what has happened since then.  What has changes with your client since then?  What about the marketplace. Are there new vendors to discover that might meet their needs today?   Be neutral but at the same time educate, counsel and stay close.

3)     If your experience has been strictly on the IT side of life and selling (oops there is a non-IT word) SaaS applications to Marketing, Sales, HR, or Finances is not in your comfort zone, take heart.  There is a proliferation of IT-based SaaS and Managed Service applications that have come to market in the last year and it looks like we are on the launch pad for growth at nearly light speed; particularly for security related apps.  Get to know the security-based SaaS applications that your current IT vendors are talking about or promoting.  Help the CIO be a hero.

So with one or all three easy steps, you’ll find SaaS plays right up the proverbial VAR’s valley: a sustained dialogue with the CIO/CTO and technical expertise that showcases your IT skills and experience, bar none!

Last week at Sales 2.0 several vendors described how they track and measure disqualified leads in the sales funnel.  It is an interesting concept because it implies that the company understands what a qualified lead looks and feels like in the first place.   It also hints at the growing convergence between Marketing and Sales but that is another subject.

On the channel side, how many vendors proactively qualify their partners (meaning are they actively culling partners that aren’t productive)?  This may mean a conundrum for SaaS companies, particularly those in the early stages of selling and deploying their applications.   How do you convince partners to invest time and resources when the sales model isn’t clear?

Most early SaaS companies take a more reactive approach and recruit partners with the HOPE of recurring revenue.  After a few months or maybe after the first year  of sales (multiple by 7 to get the equivalent in dog-years for premise solutions), early stage SaaS companies often find that their ecosystem is full of partners recruited because they were ‘friendly’ or ‘family’ but have demonstrated limited ‘sell through’ momentum and success.  They are left with the unfriendly and less than fun topic over the phone (not even over coffee or drinks) to politely ‘disengage’.

It is true that SaaS applications are easy to deploy and derive early value for customers.  It is certainly logical to have a low-barrier to entry from a partner model perspective.  It does, however, make some sense to at least develop the profile of the ideal partner.  Not only based on their geography or reputation but take a closer look at their business model, how they provide value to their (yours-to-be) customers and the shared domain expertise. The profile of the ideal partner is a recipe of some blend of these 3 elements.

Some up front, thoughtful work about aligning the vendors’ SaaS application, domain expertise and the partner’s capabilities will save some grief on the back end of partner ‘disqualification’.